I guess it doesn't matter that much since this series seems pretty good and the occasional mistake doesn't really mean anything. Congratulations, you are an attentive reader. Even if a published analysis is correct, the reader should always be asking, “wait, is that true?” When I find the occasional mistaken analysis, instead of being upset with the author for making it, I am happy with myself for finding it. If you find it annoying, just think how Yusupov feels about it.ģ. (d) Somehow an older version of the file was printed.Īuthor’s fault? Editor’s? Printer’s? Regardless, it’s at the author’s door. (b) During the checking phase they detected the problem. (a) During the selection phase this example was included. It’s easy to imagine a scenario for this: 15.93 (41 Used & New offers) ( 45 ) Build Up Your Chess 2: Beyond The Basics (Yusupovs Chess School) Nov 1, 2008. Then you will deeply appreciate reading a book with few errors.Ģ. Boost Your Chess 1: The Fundamentals (Yusupovs Chess School) Jan 1, 2010.
Fischer tried with My 60 Memorable Games, and even he did not succeed. It’s not possible to write a book without error. To make sure that this new knowledge sticks, it is then tested by a selection of puzzles. I like this book but I hate coming across simple refutations like this. Artur Yusupov’s complete course of chess training stretches to nine volumes, guiding the reader towards a higher chess understanding using carefully selected positions and advice.
0 kommentar(er)
